The sorption isotherm describes the water
activity as function of the water content expressed on a dry matter basis. The
sorption isotherm is a curve that can be determined empirically and can be
predicted by the Law of Rault (however it is not precise). It gives us an idea about
interactions between water and other food constituents; it also gives us
information about the availability of the water as function of the water
content, therefore different zones in the isotherms can also be distinguished
(zone1, zone 2, zone3). If the isotherms are constructed under different
temperatures, additional information about the heat of evaporation can be found
(important in the design of drying equipment)
BET (brunour emet teller )Isotherm: By fitting
experimental data to the empirical equation, the monolayer (potential) water
content can be derived. It is a very interesting parameter, because when the moisture content equals to the
monolayer water, the food reaches the highest stability. It is an
interesting parameter to know, because when drying food it is not recommended
to dry further than monolayer water. BET is only useful in the lower part of
sorption isotherm (below value of 0.4).

GAB isotherm: it is more complex, and cannot be
linearized. It needs to be solved withnonlinear regression equation with
statistical software. Can be used over the whole water activity range. It is a
more powerful equation that BET.

There are 3 different kinds of sorption isotherms (linking water activity and water content):
ü Type I: typical for anticaking agents (eg. Sodium silicate). These
components have a large moisture adsorption capacity. When binding sites are
occupied, no water uptake is possible due to which reaches a plateau in
moisture content.
GRAFICO

ü Type II: Has an S shape, the shape is a result of several interaction
forces between water and food (contains
bound water- constitutional, vicinal & molayer). Typical of polymeric of
polymeric food ingredients such as proteins and polysaccharides. Foods with
amorphous low molecular weight will show such an hygroscopic behaviour. Such
products are vulnerable for caking at too high relative humidity. It has 2
inclination points, the 1st one responds to the addition of
multilayer water causing as well to the filling of pores and capillaries, and the 2nd inclination responds
to further swelling and dissolution of some of its components.
ü Type III: typical of foods rich in cristaline low molecular weight
components like sugar and salt. Calles J shaped sorption isotherm. Moisture
uptake is very restricted until the low molecular weight components start to
dissolve in the absorved water (deliquescent point).
GRAFICO

We can also distinguish 3 zones (link with the kinds of water) in the sorption isotherm,
this zones can be related to the kinds of water: Zone
III: significant change in moisture content, results in a restricted change
in a restricted change of water activity; Zone
II: small change of moisture content, results in a big change in water
activity; Zone I: is determined by
the bound water in the food: constitutional, vicinal and monolayer.
GRAPH OF ZONES

Temperature dependency
Increasing the temperature will
increase the water activity and availability of water also increase. In a SI
with different temperatures (eg. 30, 45, 50° SI f potatoes) you see that at
fixed moisture content, there will be a shift of the sorption isotherm to the
right. So it has a drastic impact on the water activity. Meaning that the
increase in temperature (in aqueous food) will have a dual effect on the
stability of the food because: 1.The solvent will become more available and 2.
There is a kinetic factor, browman motion, so reactivity of the molecules
increase. SI at higher temperature will
start to cross, it is because at higher temperature the solubility of the
components increase. From the temperature dependency and from clausious
claperon equation, at particular moisture content, we can calculate the heat of
evaporation, energy required to remove water out of the food (at that
particular moisture content). The lower the moisture content the steeper the
line, because at the high water conteng (40g /100g of DM), the amunt of
multilayer water in the food on total amount is very high and this is the
weakest part of the chai. So the heat of evaporation will not be that high. So
the slope will not be high. So the slope will be almost as free water. When we
remove water from the matrix, the water will be more and more bound resulting
in a bigger curve. The curves are important with regards to drying foods in
industry. it is needed to calculate how much heat we need. The heat required is
not equal to the normal heat of free water, because as the water evaporates the
heat of evaporation also increases (due to strong interaction of bond water).
So in general the heat of sorption as function of the moisture content:
al low water content, the heat of sorption will be similar to the normal water,
and when you lower the water content you will see it increases. Thus we will
have much more water.
Consequences: dual effect.
1.
The higher the temperature the faster
the browman motion. The molecules walk fatser at higher temperatures and when
they walk faster there can be more reactions.
2.
The water becomes more available, so
the water activity increases. Thus solvent capability of the water increase.
This will also favor the reactivity of the food.
GRAPH



In view of the temperature dependency
of Aw, the sorption isotherms are temperature dependent:
-
Generally at higher temperatures and
similar water contents, the water becomes more available, the water is more
available, but it is also important to consider that at higher water
activities, an increase in temperatures will cause an improvement in the
soluvility of the substances, which results in a decrease I the water activity.
Hence, at higher water activities, SI may cross each other.
-
Satability of moisture content: the
stability of a food is highest when its mpisture content equals the monolayer
water content.
Hysteresis
It is the relationship between water content
and water activity depends upon the fact whether you dry the food or make the
food humid, so there is a relationship between desorption and adsorption. If you dry your food, it will follow the
solid line (by experimentally doing the sorption), when you put it in a wet
environment again the same dried products) it will follow the dotted line.
Meaning that the SI at the same moisture content will show higher water
activity. It happens because when you dry the food and remove the water out of
the capiaries, it is very difficult to put the water back into the
capillaries. Therefore at the same water
content it will reach easier the monolayer water content, so the water will be
more available. Another explanation is related to the impact of water content
on protein structure, because water is important to retain the protein
structure (by freezing you but bound water into a cristal grid). It means that
if temperature is low enough we are able to take bound water, this means that
we can change the hydratation state of a protein. Due to this proteins can
denature (they change structure and unfold). So the water biding capacities
after freezing change (water binding capacities become lower) because we are
unfolding the protein (by denaturation) and the interior part of the molecule
is more hydrophobic than the exterior part. Consequence: the water activity
also depends on the history of the product.
GRAPH HISTERESIS

Practical consequences:
·
We can determine the amount of water in
foods
·
Wc/Wa interaction
·
Availability of water as function of
water content and as function of temperature.
·
Heat of evaporation
·
Derive monolayer water and stability of
food.
Criticism to concept of aw:
·
Thermodynamically – non equilibrium conditions.
Theoretically there are problems because it is derived from thermodynamics. In
thermodynamics we suppose that the foods are in equilibrium but foods are never
in equilibrium. From thermodynamics, desorption and sorption should be the
same. So the concept of water activity is still not solved.
·
Hysteresis phenomenon- cannot explain it
thermodynamically.
·
‘strange’ observations. Eg. Amorphous lactose:
the moisture content drops as function of time. It is not explainable. Also at
higher water activity it collapse and becomes very dense, there is
crystallization after 0.45 water activity.
Selected effects on microbiological stability
No comments:
Post a Comment